Collateral Consequences When Charged in Civilian Court
Military service members facing civilian court criminal charges should approach deferred adjudication with caution, as it can have significant implications for their careers, security clearances, and future opportunities. While deferred adjudication may seem appealing—offering a chance to avoid a formal conviction—it often carries hidden risks that can disproportionately affect those in the military.
First, deferred adjudication is not equivalent to a dismissal or acquittal. It typically requires an admission of guilt or a plea, which will be treated as a conviction in military contexts. Military law and service regulations prioritize good order and discipline, meaning commanders will view such pleas as evidence of misconduct, even without a formal conviction. A deferred adjudication can also lead to administrative actions, such as non-judicial punishment, separation proceedings, or unfavorable evaluations, which can derail a service member’s career.
Second, security clearances are a cornerstone of many military roles. Deferred adjudication often appears on background checks, as it involves court supervision, probation, or other conditions. Clearance adjudicators may interpret this as evidence of untrustworthiness or poor judgment, especially for charges involving violence, drugs, or moral turpitude. A suspended or revoked clearance can limit job assignments, halt promotions, or force early separation, as many billets require clearance eligibility.
Third, military culture emphasizes accountability and integrity. Accepting deferred adjudication may be seen as sidestepping responsibility, which can erode trust among peers and leadership. Service members are held to a higher standard, and actions that might seem minor in civilian life—such as a deferred plea for a misdemeanor—can trigger disproportionate consequences in the military, including damage to reputation and credibility.
Finally, the long-term impact extends beyond active duty. Veterans seeking civilian jobs, especially in law enforcement or government, may face scrutiny over deferred adjudication records. These records, while not always convictions, can complicate background checks and licensing processes, limiting post-service opportunities.